Building a High-Performance Sales Team with Dave Kurlan

Building a High-Performance Sales Team with Dave Kurlan

Welcome to another episode of Flowing Sales, where we dive deep into the dynamics of sales operations within the manufacturing sector. Today, we are thrilled to host Dave Kurlan, a seasoned expert in sales consultancy and the author of a best-selling book on sales tactics. Dave brings decades of experience in evolving sales roles from generalized to specialized functions, particularly in manufacturing and rep firms. In this episode, Dave shares invaluable insights from his article "Do You

Have Woodpeckers in Your Sales Organization?" discussing the crucial differences between 'hunters' and 'farmers' in sales teams, and which strategies help enhance their performance. He also critiques the modern approach of using junior reps for prospecting and scheduling, explaining why it might be hindering rather than helping your sales team's effectiveness. Dave will outline how properly assessing and aligning sales team roles based on competencies rather than just sales figures can lead to significant improvements in efficiency and revenue.

Whether you're struggling with flat sales or looking to optimize your sales force, Dave's expertise will guide you towards actionable solutions. Don't forget to check out the links to Dave's blog and book in our show notes for more depth on these topics. Join us to gain a competitive edge in your sales operations and ensure your team not only meets but exceeds their targets.

Dave Kurlan's Blog: https://kurlan.me/SalesBlog

Free Assessment Tool is https://stats.objectivemanagement.com/1DKPodcast

Dave's Email: DKurlan@KurlanAssociates.com

Baseline Selling Book: https://amzn.to/2UZvWG6

Dave Kurlan on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davekurlan/

Dave Kurlan on X: https://twitter.com/KurlanAssoc

[00:00:00] Welcome back to Flowing Sales. We are honored to have Dave Curlan on our podcast today. He

[00:00:09] is the author of a bestselling book. He is the author also of a industry renowned blog

[00:00:16] and runs his own company, Curlan & Associates, an all-around expert on sales, especially

[00:00:21] in the manufacturing space, manufacturing rep space. We'll have links to his blog

[00:00:26] and his book in the show notes, so be sure to check those out. But otherwise, we just

[00:00:30] wanted to welcome you onto the show and get going to talk about some sales tactics.

[00:00:35] Thanks so much for thinking of me, inviting me on the show. It's great to be here.

[00:00:39] Thank you. So the reason we initially invited Dave onto the show, we saw an article that he

[00:00:45] wrote about how to do more effective sales. It was called Do You Have Woodpeckers in

[00:00:51] Your Sales Organization talks about how hunters versus farmers, how that kind of relates, how

[00:00:56] that can help us, that sort of that paradigm, how that can help us be better sales professionals.

[00:01:00] So maybe we can just jump into kind of that topic and we'll go from there. Sounds good.

[00:01:05] So what would you say some advice you have hunters versus farmers is one better than

[00:01:10] the other? Should a salesperson be both? What do you think? You know it's changed over the years

[00:01:15] back in the day and I've been selling professionally since 1973 and I've been in

[00:01:20] the sales development business since 1986. So if we go back to the 80s, since I've been in this

[00:01:26] business, most sales organizations had sales people who did everything. You know, they

[00:01:32] ran opportunities from the cradle to the grave. They found them, they talked to them,

[00:01:37] they closed them and they serviced them. And then over the years, especially after the

[00:01:42] turn of the century, we started to see a lot more specialization. You know with BDRs,

[00:01:48] SERs, account executives and account managers, key logo folks, we have national accounts and

[00:01:54] major accounts. And I think some specialization is good because not everybody has the skills to

[00:02:00] do everything. So there are a lot of sales people who will not hunt ever, no matter what,

[00:02:08] it's not in their DNA. So they need to be in an account management role. They need to be farming.

[00:02:14] And there are a lot of sales people who only want to hunt. I mean, they love the thrill of the kill

[00:02:21] and finding and closing opportunities but don't want to be bogged down managing those customers

[00:02:27] and clients. So they absolutely should be in a hunting role. But that BDR role that was brought

[00:02:34] in by mostly software as a service, SaaS companies, they decided that they shouldn't

[00:02:41] be wasting their account managers precious time by having them engage in prospecting. So they brought

[00:02:47] in teams of business development reps who would do outbound and schedule first meetings. And I

[00:02:55] hate that. I mean, it's all over the place. It's probably not going to get out, get

[00:03:00] blown up at this point, but I think it should be blown up. You've got the most difficult part

[00:03:05] of any sales cycle is reaching out, getting a decision maker on the phone and scheduling the

[00:03:12] first meeting. Even the best sales people on the planet will say that's the hardest part because

[00:03:18] once they're in front of somebody, they've got a little bit of control over how it goes from there.

[00:03:23] Yet what have these brilliant company executives done? They've taken the youngest, most inexperienced

[00:03:30] sales people on the planet right out of school and they put them in the job doing the most difficult

[00:03:37] thing in the world, reaching out to decision makers and trying to schedule a first meeting.

[00:03:41] And they're incentivized by how many first meetings they book. Now a couple of things,

[00:03:45] they suck at it. They book an average of one and a half meetings a week. That's pretty freaking

[00:03:50] bad. And number two, they don't book meetings that I would call quality meetings. So now

[00:03:56] you're wasting A's time following up on crappy meetings that were set. Now I've been selling

[00:04:02] since 1973, like I mentioned at the beginning of your show. There's no way I want some kids

[00:04:08] scheduling my meetings for me. I even at 68 years old and with all this experience,

[00:04:14] I would prefer to make a cold reach out myself if it came to that, to book my own meetings

[00:04:20] then follow up on a meeting that a 23 year old right out of college just booked for me.

[00:04:25] Other than that, I don't have an opinion. Well, if you had the youngest people performing the

[00:04:32] prospecting piece, which is the hardest part like Dave said, sometimes you've run the risk of running

[00:04:37] some probably talented farmers, you know, account managers off because you're putting them in a

[00:04:42] place they don't want to do it. They're not very good at it. But you know what? These folks

[00:04:46] might be, you know, A players from the standpoint of being an account manager. Do

[00:04:51] you see that from time to time or across the industry? Yeah, you know, the biggest problem.

[00:04:56] We evaluate a lot of sales teams before we start working with them, before we do training and

[00:05:01] coaching and consulting. We do a sales team evaluation so that we can figure out what

[00:05:06] they got, what their capabilities are in 21 sales core competencies, what their potential is,

[00:05:12] where they need help. And one of the things that's most evident is that the sales leaders

[00:05:18] don't have any clue what their sales people's capabilities are, because the only thing they're

[00:05:22] doing is looking at the numbers, that the dollar numbers, the revenue, and you can't rank

[00:05:28] salespeople or determine capabilities based on revenue because your account managers who have

[00:05:35] the best accounts are going to have the highest revenue. But it doesn't mean that they're

[00:05:39] the best salespeople. They're just responsible for managing the most revenue. So from sales leadership

[00:05:46] on up, they miscalculate and mislabel who their producers are. And that's the shame because without

[00:05:56] knowing who's really good at growing the company as opposed to who's really good at managing revenue,

[00:06:03] it's impossible to strategize properly and optimize a sales organization so that the

[00:06:09] right people are in the right roles doing the right things for the right reasons.

[00:06:13] How do you go about measuring that? Is that more, like you say, you do an assessment and it's more

[00:06:19] kind of personality based or are there other mechanisms? Yeah, we don't look at personality

[00:06:24] at all since personality types aren't correlated to any kind of sales output or performance or

[00:06:31] success. We use OMG objective management groups, sales team evaluation, and that measures sales

[00:06:39] people in 21 sales core competencies. And as an aside, I founded OMG in 1990. I was the CEO until 2022.

[00:06:50] I was a senior advisor there until my exit in 2023 and it is head and shoulders way above any

[00:06:58] other assessment on the market because it's sales specific and it just measures sales

[00:07:02] competencies, not personalities and not behaviors and not cognitive abilities but

[00:07:08] sales capabilities. And once we're measuring sales capabilities and sales competencies,

[00:07:14] then we can much more easily see who should be in which role and what kind of gaps they have in their

[00:07:22] skill sets and what kind of training and coaching they need to get. Do you find that

[00:07:27] once you do this assessment and figure out kind of where people should be, do you try to

[00:07:32] train? I'm assuming you have them focus on their strengths and then train more of those strengths

[00:07:38] as opposed to, hey, this person needs to do multiple things. Let's try to train them on everything

[00:07:43] but maybe not. How broad of the skill set should somebody have versus like let's get them really

[00:07:49] good at a specific thing? That's a fantastic question. So to answer that so that it makes

[00:07:54] sense, need to understand a little about what it's measuring. So there's three major categories

[00:08:02] that that assessment looks at. The first is will to sell or grit or heart and soul. It's

[00:08:10] commitment, how committed they are to achieving greater sales success. It's desire, how bad

[00:08:16] they want it. It's motivation, what's behind that desire. It's their outlook and it's whether

[00:08:22] they take responsibility for their results. So that's one category. You can't train that

[00:08:28] category. That's either where it needs to be or it's an indicator that they're probably not going

[00:08:34] to change because it's not important enough to them. The second category is sales DNA. That's

[00:08:39] the collection of strengths that will support sales process, sales methodology, sales strategy,

[00:08:46] sales tactics and sales DNA is hard to train. You can make sales people aware of how their

[00:08:55] sales DNA impacts their results in the field and on the phone, but it can really only be improved

[00:09:02] through coaching. And then the third category is the stuff that you'd be familiar with. It's

[00:09:06] 10 tactical selling competencies like hunting, reaching decision makers, building relationships,

[00:09:14] taking a consultative approach, selling value, their approach to presentations,

[00:09:20] whether they're presenting the right ideas to the right people at the right time for the right

[00:09:25] reasons, their ability to close their ability to use sales process and their ability to use

[00:09:31] sales technology. So that first category will do sell. That tells us whether they're going to get

[00:09:37] any better or not. The second category tells us what's in the way and why they may be struggling.

[00:09:43] And the third category gives us the specific skill sets and allows us to hone in on

[00:09:49] where they need help through training and coaching. How big of an impact does an assessment

[00:09:54] like that? Do you have any, it'd be great to hear maybe a story or an example of where you applied

[00:09:59] this and all of a sudden, oh, well let's move this person here, let's move that person there.

[00:10:02] Like how fast of an impact can an assessment like that make in an organization? I'll share

[00:10:08] one of those stories. And for context, OMG has assessed two and a half million sales people.

[00:10:13] So we're not talking about some tiny little data set. So one example was a technology company and

[00:10:20] when I talked to them, they had been flat for four years, no growth in some of their territories.

[00:10:28] They had 100% turnover and they originally reached out because they wanted to assess sales

[00:10:34] candidates. And I said, you know, that's fine. But if you've got 100% turnover and flat sales,

[00:10:43] assessing your sales candidates isn't going to fix that problem. That'll help on sales selection.

[00:10:49] But first, you need to understand why you've got 100% turnover and why the sales people

[00:10:54] you're hiring or have hired aren't growing revenue. So we did the sales team evaluation and the

[00:11:00] there were three things that were really evident from the sales team evaluation.

[00:11:05] Big picture. Number one is that their sales management team sucked. It was as bad as any

[00:11:13] that I had ever seen. They weren't doing any coaching, they weren't holding salespeople accountable

[00:11:19] and they didn't even want to be sales managers. So they had to be replaced. The second problem was

[00:11:26] it appeared that they were hiring sales people out of a major long time competitor.

[00:11:33] So they were in data storage, but they were hiring salespeople from EMC and Sun who had sold

[00:11:41] data storage. But those salespeople were used to having the red carpet rolled out.

[00:11:47] They were from the big players. They could get in any time. Their companies would buy the

[00:11:51] business if they had to and discount the business to win it. And now they go to a new

[00:11:57] company with a new technology that nobody's ever heard of and they don't know how to overcome

[00:12:01] resistance. So they were hiring the wrong salespeople. And then the third problem was that they were

[00:12:08] completely lacking sales process and the salespeople that they had were pretty much

[00:12:15] sucky because not only had they been hired from the companies where it was easy to sell,

[00:12:22] they didn't have any selling ability. They were just living off the company's name and

[00:12:27] resources. So the first thing we did was with the CEO's permission, we hired them six

[00:12:34] new sales managers to lead the team. We trained up and coached up the sales managers so that

[00:12:40] they could coach effectively. And then we showed the sales managers how to hire the right salespeople

[00:12:46] using the OMG candidate assessment. And the result of that story, which was too long to tell,

[00:12:53] was that they went from completely flat sales of 24 million for four straight years and they

[00:13:00] doubled sales inside of 12 months even with all the changes that we were making.

[00:13:04] That's wild. And then the interesting twist to the story, one of the board members was Larry

[00:13:10] Ellison who owns Oracle and he decided to buy them. He was so excited about the growth

[00:13:18] they achieved in that 12 months. He bought them and we lost the client because we did such a good

[00:13:24] job. You lost the acquisition because you did too good of a job. You got to turn it down a little bit.

[00:13:33] That's right. That's exactly what happened. That's wild. I mean, because that's something

[00:13:38] that I think a lot of times people maybe don't even realize, right? You can't see. I mean,

[00:13:43] maybe there's indicators or there's flags like, hey, this person isn't where they're supposed

[00:13:46] to be. But for the most part are the things you're talking about more or less invisible or what should

[00:13:53] someone be looking for to know they have an issue, right? Where I need to revamp this.

[00:13:57] Yeah, they're invisible. They're exactly because sales leadership and the C-suite is so invested

[00:14:05] in the dollar amount. That's all they see. Well, this is our best salesperson because he

[00:14:09] leads the team with $7 million a year in revenue. This is our worst salesperson because

[00:14:14] he's only generating 750,000 a year in revenue. But it could be that the person managing $7

[00:14:22] million in revenue is just living off his past, inherited that $7 million worth of accounts,

[00:14:29] is in the best territory that the company has, hasn't grown the business at any's worth.

[00:14:37] And it's possible that $750,000 salesperson is brand new, brought in all that business

[00:14:43] from scratch in the first year and is doing more than anybody else to grow the business.

[00:14:47] So when you start looking at the factors that aren't revenue, if you start looking at the factors

[00:14:54] that revolve around what it takes to grow the company, what it takes to bring in new accounts,

[00:15:00] what it takes to grow existing accounts, then it totally reorders your perspective on who's

[00:15:07] really valuable to the company and who isn't. And then of course the sales team evaluation

[00:15:12] further enhances that with a look into who's going to get better, how much better can they get,

[00:15:18] how long will it take, what do you have to do with them. And then you've got the complete picture.

[00:15:23] And of course sales management is always a part of that equation. Sometimes it's the key part

[00:15:29] like it was with the example I gave you. Sometimes it's a contributing factor but

[00:15:33] they always play a part. How would people get started thinking about this? I mean I know

[00:15:39] they can, aside from taking the entire assessment, are there early steps that you can take to start

[00:15:45] and assess your sales team? There are three things that companies can do. I can email you some links

[00:15:51] that you can include in your show notes but OMG has one tool where you can have your sales

[00:15:58] people take an assessment and you can look at how they compare to your industry to business

[00:16:05] in general and you can see the results aggregately. You won't get any individual reports or reporting

[00:16:12] on the team or the people for free. You can make a purchase to get that information but you can at

[00:16:19] least get started for free. Is there anything in, I mean you've done lots of these assessments

[00:16:23] right and seen a lot of things. Is there any pattern or trends that you've seen in I don't

[00:16:30] know skills or grit like you're saying that you most commonly see people have misaligned?

[00:16:36] Yeah I think right now the three things that we're seeing most is that number one sales people aren't

[00:16:45] getting to decision makers and statistically we know that sales people who get to decision makers

[00:16:52] early in the sales process are 341 percent more likely to get the business so that's huge.

[00:16:59] Number two because they're not getting to decision makers it's harder for them to take a

[00:17:05] consultative approach because the folks lower in the organization were just tasked to get information

[00:17:11] don't want to have that kind of a conversation because they're not having a or taking a

[00:17:16] consultative approach and being effective during discovery they're not really uncovering any

[00:17:22] compelling reasons to buy it and to buy from them therefore there's no urgency and without any of

[00:17:30] those elements it makes it really difficult for them to sell value because the value comes from

[00:17:36] uncovering their compelling reasons to buy and from a decision maker who's the only one who

[00:17:43] can really articulate what the value would be so those three things followed by probably

[00:17:49] not following sales process effectively or the process being ineffective at the company are the

[00:17:56] things that I'm seeing most frequently right now and if you add a layer to that sales people

[00:18:02] sales managers not coaching and when they do coach not doing it the right way would be

[00:18:07] the fourth thing that I see the most of. You mentioned not not getting to decision makers

[00:18:12] what is the biggest impediment there in today's marketplace like why aren't they getting

[00:18:17] to decision makers what can they do to improve that there's a couple of things decision makers are

[00:18:22] being insulated so they're harder to reach but that said a lot of sales people think that as

[00:18:29] long as they're talking to somebody who's enthusiastic that's enough because they're

[00:18:34] not comfortable either going around that person asking that person to get the decision maker

[00:18:39] engaged or they don't believe it's necessary to be talking with the decision maker it's not

[00:18:45] a milestone in the sales process that they need to be talking to a decision maker they think this

[00:18:50] person will get the job done for them maybe this person lied about their decision making ability

[00:18:55] but it's just not taken seriously enough. Okay interesting I know we're coming up on time I know

[00:19:02] your time is valuable so Craig did you have any additional? I think you made a good point about

[00:19:07] the decision making we see a lot of sales people in the industry that they get comfortable

[00:19:13] with the relationship with a particular person and I think that's a hurdle to get over and Dave

[00:19:19] touched on that where they're not willing to ask the question hey can we get so-and-so involved

[00:19:26] in this because you know they're the ones that are going to ultimately sign off on it or are

[00:19:32] there ways to keep the relationship and still be able to involve that person that will

[00:19:39] ultimately decide if they go this way or this way so I think that that's something that we can do

[00:19:47] better as a company is not just stopping with our in our comfort zone is get out of the comfort zone

[00:19:53] make sure we're engaging the right people and you don't have to go around anybody I think it's

[00:19:57] just a matter of how you do it and then you can actually use that person who you're dealing

[00:20:02] with on a day-to-day basis and bring those others in so you're dealing with the right team in most

[00:20:09] cases to get the decision that you ultimately want. I agree with that and there's two things I can

[00:20:15] close with one let's take the sales person who does get to the decision maker and has a conversation

[00:20:22] with a decision maker and the folks who are tasked to gather information and proposals and

[00:20:28] quotes they go to the decision maker and they say so we narrowed it down to these three suppliers

[00:20:34] ABC company XYZ company and LMO company and the decision maker looks at it and says oh I met the

[00:20:42] guy from LMO let's go with that but it's a known the other thing is if sales people are having

[00:20:52] a good discovery conversation and they can uncover a compelling reason to buy they can

[00:20:57] ask a question like well who else cares about this and that's a non-threatening way of finding out

[00:21:04] who the decision maker is and it's done earlier in the sales process so it's not done at the

[00:21:11] milestone where you have to get to the decision maker so it's way before a dumb sales person would

[00:21:18] ask a dumb question like so who's the decision maker just who else cares about this we'll

[00:21:24] get you an honest well bob cares about this well who's bob that's my boss who else cares about it

[00:21:29] charlie cares about this who's charlie he's our ceo said well i'm sure they have some opinions about

[00:21:37] what would be an ideal situation and how the problem you described is affecting them

[00:21:42] is there a time we can get them involved in the discussion it's so much more effective

[00:21:47] and conversational than can you tell me who the decision maker is yeah because we're seeing a

[00:21:53] lot of times these days it's decision by committee and it's even that much more important than just

[00:21:59] getting to a decision maker because in most cases those are multiple people and they're

[00:22:04] representing the specific wants and needs of a group within your customer so you got to be able to

[00:22:13] work with the people that you work with every day but then also be able to branch out and get to

[00:22:18] those people that will ultimately end up on the committee and make these decisions so it's that much

[00:22:24] more important like i think david that was a great question to ask is like who else is this

[00:22:29] important to and then you're able to get to them ask the right questions and you kind of start

[00:22:35] to formulate your plan to address those needs of this group or that group and then hopefully

[00:22:43] end up getting the committee to decide with with your solution and i promised that on the day you

[00:22:49] get to present to the committee if there's four or six or eight people sitting around the table

[00:22:55] that's not the day where they decide who's going to get the business they already know at that

[00:23:00] point and if you've individually met with each of those people then it's much more likely to

[00:23:05] be you on that day the lines are already drawn in the sand minds are made up decisions have been

[00:23:13] formed and all you can do is screw it up no pressure yeah exactly well david we appreciate

[00:23:21] you the time coming on and joining joining us thanks for inviting me i enjoyed the conversation

[00:23:27] cool all right um what's the best way people can can work with you or reach out if they want

[00:23:31] to continue the kind of circle uh reach out by email and i'm sure you'll include that in the show notes

[00:23:37] right yep we'll put it in there yeah we'll do it all right all right well thank you so much

[00:23:42] dav we appreciate it thanks dad thanks for having me we'll do